Art
Education STEP Task Force
Committee
Members
Dr.
Jane Rhoades Hudak
Ms.
Dabney Edenfield
Mr.
Larry Smith
Ms.
Debby Smith
Dr.
Bruce Little
Introduction
Professor
of Art Education/Director of Graduate Art Education Swainsboro High School Art
Teacher Demonstration Teacher Screven Middle Grade Art Teacher/Clinical
Associate Demonstration Teacher
Todd
-Grant Elementary Art Teacher
Professor
of Art Education/Director of Graduate MFA Program! Director of Undergraduate
Art Education Program
The
Standards-Based Teacher Education Project (STEP), a collaborative project of
the Council for Basic Education (CBC) and the American Association of Colleges
of Teacher Education (AACTE), aims to support institutions in the redesign of
their teacher preparation programs to ensure that teacher candidates have the
content knowledge and pedagogical skills to support K-12 academic standards.
STEP
supports teams of university and K-l2 faculty to use the framework provided by
K-l2 standards and new teacher assessment requirements to examine and redefine
the following teacher preparation elements:
Entry
and exit requirements for teacher education programs;
Content
knowledge preparation of teacher candidates through disciplined-based majors;
Pedagogical
preparation of teacher candidates and its relation to subject area content; and
Entry,
interim, and exit assessments of teacher candidates that ensure adequate
content knowledge and pedagogical skills appropriate to delivering the content.
Currently,
STEP has been implemented on at least 15 campuses in Maryland, Indiana,
Kentucky, and Georgia.
Georgia
Southern University's (GSU) STEP involvement began during the 1999-2000
academic year. A Secondary Social Science certification committee and report
was the focus of the initial year. During the 2000-2001 academic year,
Secondary Mathematics certification and Secondary Language Arts certification
committees and reports were developed. This purpose of this report is to
document the Art Education STEP Task Force certification committee's process
and recommendations.
Art
Education STEP Committee Process
The
Art Education STEP committee consisted of two art educators from GSU, and three
public school art teachers from three different school systems representing
each level (i.e. elementary, middle, and secondary). All committee members are
outstanding teachers, have supervised student teachers, and have won Teacher of
the Year Awards. Dr. Jennie Rakestraw, College of Education Associate Dean met
with the committee on February 12, 2002. The committee was charged with making
recommendations on how to enhance the process of certifying art education
teachers at GSU.
To
accomplish this task the committee members familiarized themselves with the
professional standards and expectations in the field. The standards the
committee used are the National Art Education Association (NAEA) Standards
of Art Teacher Preparation, NCATE Accreditation Standards for Art P-12,
Praxis II objectives and current student scores, and the National Board for
Professional Teaching Standards (NBTBS). We also analyzed the content of all
course syllabi in the Art Department. We did this in order to recommend ways of
assuring that selected courses are in compliance with the performance-based
outcomes expected by NCA TE and NAEA, and that students are prepared for the content
of the Praxis II exams. Lastly, the committee reviewed Art Department Faculty
Curriculum Vita's to see that standards for the faculty were met.
The
Task Force decided to evaluated five broad areas:
I.
STANDARDS
FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE ART EDUCATION PROGRAM
II.
STANDARDS
FOR THE ART EDUCATION FACULTY
III.
STANDARDS
AND SKILLS FOR ART TEACHER CANDIDATES
IV.
SPACE,
FACILITIES, LIBRARY HOLDINGS, OTHER RESOURCES, ETC.
V.
GRADUATE
ART EDUCATION PROGRAMS
Findings/Recommendations
I.
STANDARDS FOR THE UNDERGRADUATE ART EDUCATION PROGRAM
1. Presently art education majors are required to take EDUF 3232-Educational Psychology: General. The committee questioned the necessity of this required course since the same material is also covered in Art 3135 and Art 3136.
2. In art studio courses, include more performance-based
objectives/assessments.
3. In art studio courses, include more integration of
computer technology into instruction and assessment.
4. The Art Department should devise strategies and plans for
helping Art Education majors prepare or
the content of the Praxis II exams in art.
B. The art teacher preparation program at GSU
provides teacher candidates with a thorough knowledge of theory and practice in art
education.
1. It is recommended that Art 3135-ArtMethods for the Art
Classroom Teacher P-5 and Art-3136 Art Methods for the Art Classroom Teacher
6-12, be required to be taken before Art 4790- Practicum in Art Education.
2. ESED 4799-Student Teaching in P-12 Education should be
converted to an Art number so that it is reflected in the Art Department load.
For years, the art education faculty have "volunteered" to have
student teachers. In order to meet NAEA Standards only qualified art educators
should be supervising art education student teachers. Art education faculty
should not always have to have student teachers as an unpaid overload.
3. The committee found that the way Art 4790-Practicum in
Art Education is presently administered is problematic. It takes a huge amount
of time to coordinate all of the field placements for this course. Art is a
speciality field and there are few art teachers in our area that can be
utilized as demonstration teachers. The daunting time-consuming administrative
tasks involved in delivering this course are unreasonable. This issue and other
work load needs have also been presented to the newly formed CLASS Secondary
Education Task Force.
4. The committee feels that because of the commitment the
art faculty have in delivering a quality art education program, we would like
to see the undergraduate program housed in the Art Department. The committee
feels a B.F.A. with Certification would better serve art education
students.(This is how UGA administers their art education program and the GSU
Art Department would like to follow suit). Also, the committee would like the
resources (e.g. funds for advising) that are presently allocated to the College
of Education, for art education, be reallocated to the Art department.
5. Presently in the state of Georgia art positions are being
cut. It is common sense that people who live in Georgia do not want to get a
degree in art education if they cannot teach art in Georgia. The committee
feels that the College of Education should help in terms of time and money to
help recruit art education students from other states.
6. The committee feels that greater emphasis needs to placed
in all education methods classes (not just art education courses) for more in
depth information concerning special needs students.
II.
STANDARDS FOR THE ART EDUCAUON FACULTY
A. The
art education faculty are competent in the practice of art education and do a
good job in preparing future teachers of art.
B.
Art Education faculty create a supportive and collaborative leaning environment
that effectively prepares successful teacher candidates.
C.
Art educators at GSU are actively engaged in scholarly inquiry and demonstrate
that they are part of a community of professionals.
III.
STANDARDS AND SKILLS FOR ART TEACHER CANDIDATES
The
committee looked in depth at the following areas and found art teacher
candidates to be proficient in: Content of Art, Knowledge of Students,
Curriculum Development, Instruction, Assessment, and Professional
Responsibility.
IV. SPACE, FACILITIES, LIBRARY
HOLDINGS, OTHER RESOURCES, ETC. A. Space and Facilities
A.
Art Education students utilize the College of Education's Learning Resource
Center. This facility is excellent. Special attention is given in the
curriculum to understanding multimedia technologies in art making and in
teaching, learning, and assessment in art in order to ensure our graduates are
current and competent in today's educational environment. The Art Department is
presently slated to move to the old laboratory school in November of2002. Many
of the department's current space issues will be resolved upon that move. The
committee recommends that there be a model art education classroom in that new
facility. College of Education Creative Arts classes could also be taught in
that space.
B.
There needs to be more funds allocated
towards art education books, fine art prints, software, etc. The holdings in
the LRC are good, but limited.
V. GRADUATE ART EDUCATION
PROGRAMS
A.
Courses
1.After reviewing the changes that have been made over the
last few years in the MED Art Education requirements, the committee was pleased
with the present program.
2. The service delivery of graduate courses needs to be more
varied (e.g. Saturday/weekend courses, courses offered at the Georgia Coastal Center,
etc.)
3. The committee was pleased with the availability of new
on-line art education courses.
4. Presently Dr. Hudak teaches foundation courses for the
Art Department. Although she enjoys teaching those courses, it takes away from
the graduate program.
5. Presently, art education faculty get no in-load credit
for Ed.S. or Doctoral research advising they conduct. This should be changed.
6. Committee members feel that presently in the College of
Education, there is a stronger emphasis on quantitative research. Researches in
our field (see Elliot Eisner's, Enlightened Eye) most often use
qualitative research methods. This issue needs serious discussion.
B.
Recruitment
1. The committee applauds recruitment efforts by the art
education faculty, specifically with the Bahamian Minister of Education to
develop a Master's Degree program for the art teachers in that country. Also,
for the development of an Art Education Graduate brochure. More needs to be
done by the College of Education to help recruit more graduate art education
students. A Newsletter or on-line information should be developed to recruit
and to notify people of course availability.
C.
Graduate Assistants
1. Although, the Art department runs College of Education
Graduate Programs, they have never provided any graduate assistants to the Art
Department. There are many interesting and educational projects that graduate
art education students could be engaged in if the Art Department were allocated
a student. They would even be interested in sharing a student half-time with
another department.
D.
SDU's
1. The committee recommends that more art SDU's be offered
around the state, especially south of Statesboro. Also, that these SDU's be
offered during the evenings and weekends.
VI.
OTHER
A.
When GSU went through semester conversion, the Department of Early Childhood
eliminated the required basic Art and Music Methods courses that almost all
other universities in the US require. Although, thankfully, Early Childhood
majors still are required to take a Creative Arts course (i.e. one course that
includes four subject areas-art, music, dance/movement, and dramas. We are
pleased that this course in now taught by a content specialist, but feel that
the. arts are neglected in the Early Childhood curriculum.
B.
Generally, the Art Education faculty do an excellent job in helping students
understand the visual arts in a global, multi-cultural, and technological
society. They do this by emphasizing cognitive approaches to art learning and
student assessment, critical inquiry of traditional and contemporary artwork,
the analysis of public and educational policy in the arts, and inquiry in the
philosophical, historical, and policy foundations of art education and arts
administration.